It does feel dragged out, like a short film stretched to feature, and gets over-complicated as a result of having too many ideas/areas and not enough of them being fully explored, meaning that there is a lack of clarity. However, '2036 Origin Unknown's' main problem is the story. Julie Cox and Steven Cree, added in apparently during post-production, are also fine. Her character was one that didn't annoy or bore me and there was effort made to develop her. The acting was also better than average, with a more than credible lead performance from Katee Sackhoff who had the hard task of carrying much of the film with not much support. It does start off well, it is intriguing, sets things up nicely and is not too badly paced. From personal opinion, it did have some atmosphere in the sets, an effective visual claustrophobia and the photography was quite nice, for low budget this could have fared much worse. The not so enthusiastic critical reception is understandable though while sharing a lot of the criticisms directed against it didn't find it that bad. A large part of me though was rather disappointed, another example of a film with great ideas and concept and just as great potential but none of them properly lived up to, not completely wasted but this should have been much more. When it comes to recent low budget recent viewings it is nowhere near close to being one of the worst. After seeing it, '2036 Unknown Origin' to me was not a terrible film, it has its moments. The low rating and lukewarm at best reviews here and much of the internet made me not sure as to whether it would be good, but there were some great ideas here and the concept sounded like the film would be good intriguing stuff if done right. '2036 Origin Unknown' actually sounded pretty interesting.

2036 origin unknown review